The Long Goodbye

It’s been a week now since the man with whom I worked for 16 years left his job. A two man team, me and him, 16 years. Think about where you were 16 years ago, in 2001. Think of all the changes you’ve been through in that time, the people you’ve worked with, alongside and for. One man, all that time.

I wasn’t sure how I’d react to it. I knew there were things I wouldn’t miss, aspects of working with him which sporadically demoralised and infuriated me. The most obvious example would be the lack of appreciation for what I do. He gave me three pieces of praise in the whole time he was my boss – and one of those was when someone sat with him, showed him something I’d done and said “It’s good, isn’t it?”, to which he could hardly say no. For a long time I just shrugged it off, laughed and said it’s just the way he is. Towards the end though, I realised quite how corrosive it had been. I had an interview for a job a couple of months back, and the feedback I got afterwards said that I was very negative about my own achievements and played down everything I had done. Wonder where I got that from?

The other fascinating quirk I’ll manage without was his inability to observe the fundamental principles of interaction – the basic give and take of conversation. You tell me about your weekend, I’ll tell you about mine. You tell me about your life, I’ll tell you about mine. Not with him. You tell me about your weekend, and that will conclude that exchange. I would have done the same, of course, but he was my boss and I felt like it was prudent to maintain a certain level of bonhomie. It all ran in one direction though. I’d be amazed if even at the end he could name my children, for example. After 16 years we were no closer than we were after 16 days. He told me early on that he hated football, so I learned quickly not to mention it unless I wanted to hear a rant about how everyone who likes football is a sheep and a moron. (Never mind that I was right there, quite evidently neither of those.) He learned equally quickly that I hate dogs, and yet for years would tell me stories about his, either oblivious to that fact or just not caring. You know, those stories people tell about their dogs where they’re dying for you to say how funny or adorable they are. And I would listen and nod and chuckle in appropriate places, all the time wondering what he was getting out of it. Sometimes I start talking to people about stuff I love – phrasal verbs would be a good example – and it doesn’t take more than a few seconds to realise they don’t really care, and my enthusiasm for communicating it swiftly vanishes. Doesn’t everybody have that experience? Apparently not.

You work with someone for that long, and just like a marriage, little idiosyncrasies become infuriating (only, crucially, without the bedrock of warmth to make them tolerable). I don’t ever again need to hear that the children’s TV show Captain Pugwash included characters called Seaman Staines and Master Bates (it didn’t); nor that George Bush once said that the problem with the French is they have no word for entrepreneur (he didn’t). Nor do I need to hear the hilarious name suggestion Norfolk & Chance (at various times proposed for a quiz team, a boat, a meeting room, and doubtless others I can’t recall). It sounds like something rude, you see? Ha ha ha ha HA HA HA.

I made a conscious decision not to say any of this to him in the last few weeks before he left. What would be the point? I don’t imagine he knew how I felt, and as such letting it all spill out would be an act of pure selfish catharsis. Plus, even if he did know, I don’t imagine for a moment he would care. He didn’t demonstrate any sense of giving the slightest damn how I felt about anything else, so why would he care what I thought about him? Plus, we did have some good times, some laughs, and he left me to my own devices which, while maybe not being the best thing for me, is what I would have chosen most of the time. It would be churlish to ignore all that just to let years of repressed aggravation come roaring out.

So how did I react, after all those years, to his departure, to the empty desk where he sat? I’d presumed there would be some relief, not to mention some elation, but it turned out that I’d processed all that in the months I’ve had since I learned he was leaving. The terrible reality is that most of the time, I just didn’t think about him. And that word terrible is aimed at myself as much as anything. I’ve spent 35 hours a week for the last decade and a half with someone who has now disappeared from my life, and my reaction has been to give a mental shrug. What a waste.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

And finally…

Well, it’s the end of the 28 blogs in 28 days challenge, and what have we learned?

Not much. Let’s be honest, it’s a sporadically wordy blog trying to stay afloat in a blipvert world (and if you get that reference, you’re giving away your age, not to mention your geekiness). When I started writing a blog, they were quite fashionable and cutting edge; now, who wants to waste their time reading whole paragraphs? Most people lose interest halfway through a tweet.

Which is not to say that everything I’ve written in the past 28 days has been interesting, of course. I was aware of this pitfall when I started out. You can’t always think of something to say, and the challenge is how you get round that. To use a football analogy, as I try to do at every possible opportunity in life, can you still win when playing badly? Sometimes (as in the blog about Now TV which was looked at by a total of three people), you can’t. Sometimes, as here, you can. 21 people read that, which suggests that the pacing of the build-up kept people going for the pay-off.

Then again, there were occasions when I didn’t get the pacing right, which is a shame. The final paragraph of this one was probably the funniest I got in the whole 28 days, but not many people had the energy to plough through everything that came before it.

The most read one was this, which is fair enough, because it was probably the most worthwhile. The surprisingly romantic ones did well – this one, and this. Who knew I had it in me? Well, I did, which I guess was the point.

Most of them had no more views than the number of people who promised me at the start that they would read them, which is fine. It tells me what I already suspected, which is that my writing only really works if you know me, or certainly my style. Nobody is reading my blogs and thinking they’re worth sharing with the wider world; almost nobody commented on any of them. I think I’m OK with that.

As to whether it was a worthwhile exercise… maybe. The Chris Botti entry makes me laugh every time I re-read it, so I don’t really care that only eight other people did. And in an early one about the phrase “my other half”, I suggested that people gained nothing by “subsuming yourself into your own personal Brundlefly”. I love that line. It only means anything if you’ve seen the David Cronenberg version of The Fly, but if you have it sums up what I was trying to express perfectly. 28 days’ work for seven good words, then. I’m not sure a career change beckons.

Thanks for reading.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

They call me apostasy, that’s not my name

And so I reach the penultimate entry of my 28 day challenge, without having once had to resort to writing about football. Impressed? Surprised? There was a time when it would have been my default fall-back, but these days I feel like something of a footballing apostate.

A long time ago, I used to subscribe to a mailing list called the Level 42 Digest. I think I joined it in about 1998, by which point Level 42 had in effect been defunct for four years. Even so, there were somehow enough contributions to support daily mailings for years to come. One of the people on that mailing list was a complete Level 42 obsessive. Not only did he own everything they’d ever recorded (naturally), he owned it in umpteen different formats, and in versions that might differ by as little as the country of manufacture on the cover. What was especially weird about him was that he owned no other records. None. Every piece of recorded music he had was by Level 42. Occasionally he would offer his thoughts on other musicians (I recall he had a particular hatred for Robbie Williams), and I used to say, without meaning any real malice, that his opinions carried no weight because he was not a music enthusiast, he was a Level 42 enthusiast.

That’s almost how I feel about football now. I love supporting my team, and I love going to see my team, but the rest of it, I find it more and more of a struggle to care. Maybe it was always this way, but it feels like the incredible influx of money and attention has slowly defiled the game, stripped away the simple pleasure of the appreciation of its artistry. The personalities involved are so often vile, the managerial mind games so churlish and petty, the lack of respect so flagrant, and the cheating so endemic, it’s hard to see past it all to the beauty of a 40 yard pass landing inch perfectly, the elegance of a chip floated over a goalkeeper, the precision of a perfectly timed tackle.

Maybe it’s just a sign of maturing, or of getting old, which of course are different things. Even the Level 42 obsessive, in the end, broadened his horizons and started buying records by one other band – Deacon Blue. Like I said, not a music enthusiast.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Show, don’t tell

It’s an old film-making adage that – show, don’t tell. For those of you who aren’t film geeks, it relates to the problem of exposition. Frequently in dramas you will see characters delivering very unnatural lines like “Let me get this straight – you want me to go into the building, find the Director’s office, plant the bug in the picture frame on their desk, and get back out here without being seen?” Nobody would ever say such a thing, but it’s a quick and easy (and lazy) way of filling an audience in on what’s happening. (It is parodied excellently in the Austin Powers films by the character Basil Exposition, whose main function is to explain the plot.)

A few weeks back, someone I follow on Facebook suggested on Valentine’s Day that we should tell the people we love that we love them every day. I disagree.

This is partly because the first time I ever told someone I loved them, I didn’t really mean it (I was just saying what I thought you were supposed to at that point in our relationship), and they didn’t really want to hear it, and it was all rather awkward. So I vowed there and then that I would never again say it unless I truly felt it.

But it’s also because I think to reiterate something on a daily basis renders it largely meaningless, or if not meaningless, soulless. Fairly soon, you arrive at a place where you are saying something simply because it’s a thing you say every day, not because there is any genuine sentiment or passion behind it. If we are going to accept that the word love has any value to it at all (and that’s a conversation for another time, the way we universally collude in accepting that we will subsume dozens of complicated, challenging and rewarding emotions into one simple monosyllable), surely it’s essential that we retain its power through economy of usage?

So what to do then? Show, don’t tell. Show the person you love them with consideration, and humour, and appreciation. Put a hot water bottle in their bed in anticipation of them going upstairs. Rub their feet without being asked to. Throw away their stupid tissues which they leave lying in the armchair every night. And then (and here’s the key), when they say or do something which reminds you exactly why you fell for them in the first place, DO tell. I doubt whether I tell my wife that I love her even ten times a year. And every time I do, it’s because she’s done something magical and it feels like I’m saying it for the first time.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment